Working memoryinvolves the ability to actively hold information in mind and manipulate it to guide thoughts and behavior. Baddeley’s influential model proposes working memory comprises a central executive system that controls two short-term storage systems retaining verbal and visual information.

Children withattention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)frequently demonstrate working memory deficits, which impairs their capacity to regulate attention, think through problems, and accomplish tasks requiring temporary information retention.

A girl solving a math question on a white board at school.

Key Points

Rationale

Numerous studies have reported working memory deficits among children with ADHD (Kasper et al., 2012; Martinussen et al., 2005) as well as math difficulties in this population (DuPaul et al., 2013).

Baddeley’s (2007) influential model proposes working memory comprises a central executive system that manipulates information held briefly in phonological and visuospatial short-term memory subsystems.

Understanding relations between specific working memory components, ADHD symptoms, and math skills could inform academic interventions for children with ADHD.

Although studies generally link working memory with math skills in typical development (Peng et al., 2016; Swanson & Fung, 2016) and ADHD samples (Friedman et al., 2018; Rogers et al., 2011), questions remain regarding the unique contributions of the central executive, phonological short-term memory, and visuospatial short-term memory.

Prior studies differed in their measurement approaches (Snyder et al., 2015) or had small samples of only boys (Friedman et al., 2018).

Determining the extent to which specific working memory components predict math achievement can elucidate neurocognitive mechanisms underlying math difficulties in ADHD and inform potential intervention targets.

Method

Materials/Instruments:

Design/Procedure:

Analysis:

Sample:

Statistical Measures:

Results

The working memory bifactor (S·I-1) model showed excellent fit. All three working memory components significantly predicted the latent math outcome (R2=.56), with no significant difference between the strengths of their effects.

The central executive (β=.50), phonological short-term memory (β=.45), and visuospatial short-term memory (β=.29) were all significant predictors, suggesting approximately equal influence.

In contrast, phonological and visuospatial short-term memory were unrelated to ADHD symptoms, precluding significant indirect effects on math.

In summary, all three working memory components emerged as important predictors, together explaining over half of variance in children’s math achievement.

The central executive’s role was partially shared with regulating attention as expected, but phonological and visuospatial short-term memory exhibited significant direct effects on math skills.

Insight

This study makes several valuable contributions regarding neurocognitive processes underlying math difficulties among children with ADHD.

First, findings bolster similar evidence in community samples that working memory broadly supports math achievement (Peng et al., 2016). However, the application of bifactor modeling clarified the approximately equal roles of the central executive and subsidiary short-term memory systems specified in Baddeley’s (2007) working memory model.

Rather than the central executive alone primarily limiting math performance, as some posit (Swanson & Fung, 2016), phonological and visuospatial short-term memory also contributed significantly.

Second, despite no association with ADHD symptoms, phonological and visuospatial short-term memory retained direct predictive effects on math skills. Difficulties holding math information briefly in mind, therefore, could hinder math performance in ADHD even with an intact central executive.

From an intervention perspective, this pattern suggests targeting short-term memory may augment benefits from central executive training protocols that effectively reduce ADHD symptoms (Rapport et al., 2013) but produce only small math gains for some children (Singh et al., 2022). Further experimental work is needed to test this possibility.

Finally, findings highlight ADHD inattention symptoms as a mechanism that partially mediates some but not all working memory-math relations. Specifically, inattentive symptoms overlapped somewhat with the central executive’s role in supporting math achievement.

Still, phonological and visuospatial short-term memory influenced math skills independent of overt attention difficulties.

Consideration of both neurocognitive and symptomatic factors, therefore, will likely maximize our understanding of heterogeneous math-related impairment among children with ADHD (see Friedmanet al.,2017).

Strengths

Limitations

Implications

Clinically, findings identify neurocognitive abilities for screening children with attention or learning difficulties and have implications for developing tailored math interventions.

Still, directly training short-term memory could augment and expand intervention responders given retained relations with math achievement.

Broader implications pertain to relations between working memory, ADHD symptoms, and academic functioning.

In particular, both overlapping and distinct neurocognitive and symptomatic factors appear important for understanding heterogeneous learning-related impairments in ADHD (Friedmanet al.,2017). Shared and independent predictive effects, therefore, warrant consideration when selecting treatment targets.

Finally, this study adds to substantial evidence linking working memory to mathematics in neurotypical and clinical child populations (Geary, 2011; Swanson & Fung, 2016).

Bifactor modeling provided unique leverage to disentangle the alternatively blurred (Friedman et al., 2018) versus distinct (Metcalfe et al., 2013) contributions of component working memory processes based on prior measurement models.

Findings thus further specify neurocognitive skills supporting the complex task of math problem solving in developing learners.

References

Primary reference

Gaye, F., Groves, N. B., Chan, E. S. M., Cole, A. M., Jaisle, E. M., Soto, E. F., & Kofler, M. J. (2024). Working memory and math skills in children with and without ADHD.Neuropsychology, 38(1), 1–16.https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000920

Other references

Baddeley, A. (2007).Working memory, thought, and action.Oxford University Press.https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:Oso/9780198528012.001.0001

DuPaul, G. J., Gormley, M. J., & Laracy, S. D. (2013). Comorbidity of LD and ADHD: Implications of DSM-5 for assessment and treatment.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(1), 43–51.https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412464351

Friedman, L. M., Rapport, M. D., Orban, S. A., Eckrich, S. J., & Calub, C. A. (2018). Applied problem solving in children with ADHD: The mediating roles of working memory and mathematical calculation.Journal ofAbnormal Child Psychology, 46(3), 491–504.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-017-0312-7

Friedman, L. M., Rapport, M. D., Raiker, J. S., Orban, S. A., & Eckrich, S. J. (2017). Reading comprehension in boys with ADHD: The mediating roles of working memory and orthographic conversion.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 45(2), 273–287.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-016-0171-7

Geary, D. C. (2011). Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: A 5-year longitudinal study.Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1539–1552.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025510

Kasper, L. J., Alderson, R. M., & Hudec, K. L. (2012). Moderators of working memory deficits in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): A meta-analytic review.Clinical Psychology Review, 32(7), 605–617.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.07.001

Martinussen, R., Hayden, J., Hogg-Johnson, S., & Tannock, R. (2005). A meta-analysis of working memory impairments in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.Journal of the American Academy of Child& Adolescent Psychiatry, 44(4), 377–384.https://doi.org/10.1097/01.chi.0000153228.72591.73

Metcalfe, A. W., Ashkenazi, S., Rosenberg-Lee, M., & Menon, V. (2013). Fractionating the neural correlates of individual working memory components underlying arithmetic problem solving skills in children.Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 162–175.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2013.10.001

Peng, P., Namkung, J., Barnes, M., & Sun, C. (2016). A meta-analysis of mathematics and working memory: Moderating effects of working memory domain, type of mathematics skill, and sample characteristics.Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(4), 455–473.https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000079

Rapport, M. D., Orban, S. A., Kofler, M. J., & Friedman, L. M. (2013). Do programs designed to train working memory, other executive functions, and attention benefit children with ADHD? A meta-analytic review of cognitive, academic, and behavioral outcomes.Clinical Psychology Review, 33(8), 1237–1252.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.08.005

Rogers, M., Hwang, H., Toplak, M., Weiss, M., & Tannock, R. (2011). Inattention, working memory, and academic achievement in adolescents referred for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).Child Neuropsychology, 17(5), 444–458.https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2010.544648

Singh, L., Gaye, F., Cole, A. M., Chan, E., & Kofler, M. (2022).Academic outcomes: Behavioral parent training vs. central executive training vs. inhibitory control training for ADHD.PsyArXiv.https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/jmwbx

Snyder, H. R., Miyake, A., & Hankin, B. L. (2015). Advancing understanding of executive function impairments and psychopathology: Bridging the gap between clinical and cognitive approaches.Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 328.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00328

Swanson, H. L., & Fung, W. (2016). Working memory components and problem-solving accuracy: Are there multiple pathways?Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(8), 1153–1177.https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000116

Keep Learning

Here are some thought-provoking discussion questions about this research a college class could explore:

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Saul McLeod, PhD

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester

Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education

Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.