Close
The results of some of the most famous social psychology experiments remain relevant (and often quite controversial) today. Such experiments give us valuable information about human behavior and how group influence can impact our actions in social situations.
At a GlanceSome of the most famous social psychology experiments include Asch’s conformity experiments, Bandura’s Bobo doll experiments, the Stanford prison experiment, and Milgram’s obedience experiments. Some of these studies are quite controversial for various reasons, including how they were conducted, serious ethical concerns, and what their results suggested.
At a Glance
Some of the most famous social psychology experiments include Asch’s conformity experiments, Bandura’s Bobo doll experiments, the Stanford prison experiment, and Milgram’s obedience experiments. Some of these studies are quite controversial for various reasons, including how they were conducted, serious ethical concerns, and what their results suggested.
1The Asch Conformity ExperimentsDoug Corrance. / Getty ImagesWhat do you do when you know you’re right but the rest of the group disagrees with you? Do you bow to group pressure?In a series of famous experiments conducted during the 1950s, psychologist Solomon Asch demonstrated that people would give the wrong answer on a test to fit in with the rest of the group.InAsch’s famous conformity experiments, people were shown a line and then asked to select a line of a matching length from a group of three. Asch also placed confederates in the group who would intentionally choose the wrong lines.The results revealed that when other people picked the wrong line, participants were likely to conform and give the same answers as the rest of the group.What the Results RevealedWhile we might like to believe that we would resist group pressure (especially when we know the group is wrong), Asch’s results revealed that people are surprisingly susceptible toconformity.Not only did Asch’s experiment teach us a great deal about the power of conformity, but it also inspired a whole host of additional research on how people conform and obey, including Milgram’s infamous obedience experiments.
1
The Asch Conformity ExperimentsDoug Corrance. / Getty ImagesWhat do you do when you know you’re right but the rest of the group disagrees with you? Do you bow to group pressure?In a series of famous experiments conducted during the 1950s, psychologist Solomon Asch demonstrated that people would give the wrong answer on a test to fit in with the rest of the group.InAsch’s famous conformity experiments, people were shown a line and then asked to select a line of a matching length from a group of three. Asch also placed confederates in the group who would intentionally choose the wrong lines.The results revealed that when other people picked the wrong line, participants were likely to conform and give the same answers as the rest of the group.What the Results RevealedWhile we might like to believe that we would resist group pressure (especially when we know the group is wrong), Asch’s results revealed that people are surprisingly susceptible toconformity.Not only did Asch’s experiment teach us a great deal about the power of conformity, but it also inspired a whole host of additional research on how people conform and obey, including Milgram’s infamous obedience experiments.
The Asch Conformity Experiments
Doug Corrance. / Getty Images
What do you do when you know you’re right but the rest of the group disagrees with you? Do you bow to group pressure?
In a series of famous experiments conducted during the 1950s, psychologist Solomon Asch demonstrated that people would give the wrong answer on a test to fit in with the rest of the group.
InAsch’s famous conformity experiments, people were shown a line and then asked to select a line of a matching length from a group of three. Asch also placed confederates in the group who would intentionally choose the wrong lines.
The results revealed that when other people picked the wrong line, participants were likely to conform and give the same answers as the rest of the group.
What the Results Revealed
While we might like to believe that we would resist group pressure (especially when we know the group is wrong), Asch’s results revealed that people are surprisingly susceptible toconformity.
Not only did Asch’s experiment teach us a great deal about the power of conformity, but it also inspired a whole host of additional research on how people conform and obey, including Milgram’s infamous obedience experiments.
2The Bobo Doll ExperimentDoes watching violence on television cause children to behave more aggressively? In a series of experiments conducted during the early 1960s, psychologistAlbert Banduraset out to investigate the impact of observed aggression on children’s behavior.In hisBobo doll experiments, children would watch an adult interacting with a Bobo doll. In one condition, the adult model behaved passively toward the doll, but in another, the adult would kick, punch, strike, and yell at the doll.The results revealed that children who watched the adult model behave violently toward the doll were likelier to imitate the aggressive behavior later on.The Impact of Bandura’s Social Psychology ExperimentThe debate over the degree to which violence on television, movies, gaming, and other media influences children’s behavior continues to rage on today, so it perhaps comes as no surprise that Bandura’s findings are still so relevant.The experiment has also helped inspire hundreds of additional studies exploring the impacts of observed aggression and violence.Research Areas in Social Psychology
2
The Bobo Doll ExperimentDoes watching violence on television cause children to behave more aggressively? In a series of experiments conducted during the early 1960s, psychologistAlbert Banduraset out to investigate the impact of observed aggression on children’s behavior.In hisBobo doll experiments, children would watch an adult interacting with a Bobo doll. In one condition, the adult model behaved passively toward the doll, but in another, the adult would kick, punch, strike, and yell at the doll.The results revealed that children who watched the adult model behave violently toward the doll were likelier to imitate the aggressive behavior later on.The Impact of Bandura’s Social Psychology ExperimentThe debate over the degree to which violence on television, movies, gaming, and other media influences children’s behavior continues to rage on today, so it perhaps comes as no surprise that Bandura’s findings are still so relevant.The experiment has also helped inspire hundreds of additional studies exploring the impacts of observed aggression and violence.Research Areas in Social Psychology
The Bobo Doll Experiment
Does watching violence on television cause children to behave more aggressively? In a series of experiments conducted during the early 1960s, psychologistAlbert Banduraset out to investigate the impact of observed aggression on children’s behavior.
In hisBobo doll experiments, children would watch an adult interacting with a Bobo doll. In one condition, the adult model behaved passively toward the doll, but in another, the adult would kick, punch, strike, and yell at the doll.
The results revealed that children who watched the adult model behave violently toward the doll were likelier to imitate the aggressive behavior later on.
The Impact of Bandura’s Social Psychology Experiment
The debate over the degree to which violence on television, movies, gaming, and other media influences children’s behavior continues to rage on today, so it perhaps comes as no surprise that Bandura’s findings are still so relevant.
The experiment has also helped inspire hundreds of additional studies exploring the impacts of observed aggression and violence.
Research Areas in Social Psychology
3
The Stanford Prison Experiment
During the early 1970s,Philip Zimbardoset up a fake prison in the basement of the Stanford Psychology Department, recruited participants to play prisoners and guards, and played the role of the prison warden.
The experiment was designed to look at the effect that a prison environment would have on behavior, but it quickly became one of the most famous and controversial experiments of all time.
Results of the Stanford Prison Experiment
TheStanford prison experimentwas initially slated to last a full two weeks. It ended after just six days. Why? Because the participants became so enmeshed in their assumed roles, the guards became almost sadistically abusive, and the prisoners became anxious, depressed, and emotionally disturbed.
Ethical Concerns
Part of the notoriety stems from the study’s treatment of the participants. The subjects were placed in a situation that created considerable psychological distress. So much so that the study had to be halted less than halfway through the experiment.
Recent Criticisms
The Stanford prison experiment has long been controversial due to the serious ethical concerns of the research, but more recent evidence casts serious doubts on the study’s scientific merits.
An examination of study records indicates participants faked their behavior to either get out of the experiment or “help” prove the researcher’s hypothesis. The experimenters also appear to have encouraged certain behaviors to help foster more abusive behavior.
4
The Milgram Experiments
The results ofMilgram’s controversial obedience experimentswere astonishing and continue to be both thought-provoking and controversial today.
What the Social Psychology Experiment Involved
The study involved ordering participants to deliver increasingly painful shocks to another person. While the victim was simply a confederate pretending to be injured, the participants fully believed that they were giving electrical shocks to the other person.
Even when the victim was protesting or complaining of a heart condition, 65% of the participants continued to deliver painful, possibly fatal shocks on the experimenter’s orders.
Obviously, no one wants to believe that they are capable of inflicting pain or torture on another human being simply on the orders of an authority figure. The results of the obedience experiments are disturbing because they reveal that people are much moreobedientthan they may believe.
Controversy and Recent Criticisms
The study is also controversial because it suffers from ethical concerns, primarily the psychological distress it created for the participants. More recent findings suggest that other problems question the study’s findings.
Some participants were coerced into continuing against their wishes. Many participants appeared to have guessed that the learner was faking their responses, and other variations showed that many participants refused to continue the shocks.
Major Branches of Psychology
What This Means For YouThere are many interesting and famous social psychology experiments that can reveal a lot about our understanding of social behavior and influence. However, it is important to be aware of the controversies, limitations, and criticisms of these studies. More recent research may reflect differing results. In some cases, the re-evaluation of classic studies has revealed serious ethical and methodological flaws that call the results into question.
What This Means For You
There are many interesting and famous social psychology experiments that can reveal a lot about our understanding of social behavior and influence. However, it is important to be aware of the controversies, limitations, and criticisms of these studies. More recent research may reflect differing results. In some cases, the re-evaluation of classic studies has revealed serious ethical and methodological flaws that call the results into question.
7 SourcesVerywell Mind uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read oureditorial processto learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy.Jeon, HL.The environmental factor within the Solomon Asch Line Test.International Journal of Social Science and Humanity.2014;4(4):264-268. doi:10.7763/IJSSH.2014.V4.360Bandura and Bobo. Association for Psychological Science.Zimbardo, G.The Stanford Prison Experiment: a simulation study on the psychology of imprisonment.Le Texier T.Debunking the Stanford Prison Experiment.Am Psychol.2019;74(7):823-839. doi:10.1037/amp0000401Blum B.The lifespan of a lie.Medium.Baker PC.Electric Schlock: Did Stanley Milgram’s famous obedience experiments prove anything?Pacific Standard.Perry G.Deception and illusion in Milgram’s accounts of the obedience experiments.Theory Appl Ethics. 2013;2(2):79-92.
7 Sources
Verywell Mind uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read oureditorial processto learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy.Jeon, HL.The environmental factor within the Solomon Asch Line Test.International Journal of Social Science and Humanity.2014;4(4):264-268. doi:10.7763/IJSSH.2014.V4.360Bandura and Bobo. Association for Psychological Science.Zimbardo, G.The Stanford Prison Experiment: a simulation study on the psychology of imprisonment.Le Texier T.Debunking the Stanford Prison Experiment.Am Psychol.2019;74(7):823-839. doi:10.1037/amp0000401Blum B.The lifespan of a lie.Medium.Baker PC.Electric Schlock: Did Stanley Milgram’s famous obedience experiments prove anything?Pacific Standard.Perry G.Deception and illusion in Milgram’s accounts of the obedience experiments.Theory Appl Ethics. 2013;2(2):79-92.
Verywell Mind uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read oureditorial processto learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy.
Jeon, HL.The environmental factor within the Solomon Asch Line Test.International Journal of Social Science and Humanity.2014;4(4):264-268. doi:10.7763/IJSSH.2014.V4.360Bandura and Bobo. Association for Psychological Science.Zimbardo, G.The Stanford Prison Experiment: a simulation study on the psychology of imprisonment.Le Texier T.Debunking the Stanford Prison Experiment.Am Psychol.2019;74(7):823-839. doi:10.1037/amp0000401Blum B.The lifespan of a lie.Medium.Baker PC.Electric Schlock: Did Stanley Milgram’s famous obedience experiments prove anything?Pacific Standard.Perry G.Deception and illusion in Milgram’s accounts of the obedience experiments.Theory Appl Ethics. 2013;2(2):79-92.
Jeon, HL.The environmental factor within the Solomon Asch Line Test.International Journal of Social Science and Humanity.2014;4(4):264-268. doi:10.7763/IJSSH.2014.V4.360
Bandura and Bobo. Association for Psychological Science.
Zimbardo, G.The Stanford Prison Experiment: a simulation study on the psychology of imprisonment.
Le Texier T.Debunking the Stanford Prison Experiment.Am Psychol.2019;74(7):823-839. doi:10.1037/amp0000401
Blum B.The lifespan of a lie.Medium.
Baker PC.Electric Schlock: Did Stanley Milgram’s famous obedience experiments prove anything?Pacific Standard.
Perry G.Deception and illusion in Milgram’s accounts of the obedience experiments.Theory Appl Ethics. 2013;2(2):79-92.
Meet Our Review Board
Share Feedback
Was this page helpful?Thanks for your feedback!What is your feedback?HelpfulReport an ErrorOtherSubmit
Was this page helpful?
Thanks for your feedback!
What is your feedback?HelpfulReport an ErrorOtherSubmit
What is your feedback?
